**Health report: Had the flu, got over it with a lingering cough that turned out to be bronchitis. I'll be there Monday night.
**Due tonight--two weeks' work:
------>You should have read, hightlighted and reviewed the dialogue "Euthyphro" that was assigned the week before last. This is a basic discussion for the issue of the relationship between philosophy and religion.
------>We'll try to get a basic discussion underway about religious experience, based on the readings from St Theresa, William James and Michael Martin.
------>Written work due:
------>------>Your page on "Slow Reading"
------>------>Your reflection on the issue with religious experience.
**"Euthyphro" discussion. (See talking points in previous agenda.)
**Discussion on religious experience--
------>What exactly did St Theresa experience?
------>James' criteria for religious phenomena.
------>Martin's criticism--valid or not? Does he leave any room for a genuine level of religious experience?
**For next week: Faith and Reason--some classic texts on the relationship between the two.
------>Readings:
------>------>Thomas Aquinas, "The Harmony of Reason and Revelation," pp 92ff.
------>------>Pascal, "The Wager," pp 96ff.
------>------>Wm. Clifford, "The Ethics of Belief," pp 99ff.
------>------>Kierkegaard, "Truth is Subjectivity," pp 111ff.
------>Write a page: William Clifford says we should only believe anything when we have "sufficient evidence ... based on fair inquiry." What does he mean by this? Is it a fair standard when applied to religious belief?
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment